Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 07:33

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Thank you.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What are some sad truths about life?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Snakes in the yard … maybe more in the future - ironmountaindailynews.com
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Methane-eating sea spiders discovered off Southern California coast - SFGATE
Just in the last 5 years:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
NASA says 'city killer' asteroid could smash into moon and is 'not safe' - Irish Star
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Fed on Hold Leaves Wall Street Asking What It Will Take to Cut Interest Rates - Bloomberg.com
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.